You are currently browsing the monthly archive for December 2007.
It’s that time of year again~ we’re considering children’s books for the Jane Addams Children’s Book Award and the publishers have begun sending their contenders. It’s like Christmas everyday. As each book arrives, I eagerly tear open the package, send the publisher a thank you note, and start reading. As usual, in most cases I’m blown away by the story, the hero/heroine, the aesthetics.
I blogged about the JACBA last year:
“If children’s stories truly shape our world, as we say they do, then the types of stories we tell will impact our children and help them understand the world in which we live. Thus it is imperative, especially during this time of corruption, international chaos and social injustice, that we recognize those children’s books that ‘effectively promote the cause of peace, social justice, world community, and the equality of the sexes and all races as well as meeting conventional standards for excellence.’ So while some may question the importance and existence of so many different awards based on other criteria, I hope the Jane Addams Award‘s importance will never be questioned.”
Here’s to another season of awesome reads for the most important children’s book award 🙂
*warning: potential spoilers ahead
I just returned from watching August Rush. I wasn’t sure what to expect. Friends told me to take tissues; others simply told me how good it was. I must admit little Freddie is pretty good, and the music is absolutely beautiful. And the man who plays his dad, Jonathan Rhys Meyers isn’t so bad either 😉 However, I think Freddie looks more like Matthew Goode and would have appreciated watching him instead… couldn’t it have been a British, not Irish band? 😛
Anyway. I’ve become more sensitive to the way that orphans, orphanages, adoptees, adoptions, social work, birth parents, etc., are portrayed in popular media over the past couple of years (yes yes, I know, it always comes back to the dissertation… which is in progress. Really. As we speak…) August Rush doesn’t purport to be a completely realistic portrayal of this orphan’s life. It sort of suggests that if you never give up hope, search hard enough, and become an incredible musical prodigy, then you can find your birth parents. Um, okay. Maybe that is a bit of a stretch. But to its credit, the IMDB synopsis describes it as “a drama with fairy tale elements.” Even as I raised my eyebrows at the idea that August/Evan is an incredible musician because his birth parents are incredible musicians, I found myself appreciating this and other fantastical elements of the film. It wasn’t corny, it wasn’t over the top; not to be corny myself, the story was very lyrical. And the movie presented many scenarios that reflect the real world of orphaned children: the fact that a parent tricks his daughter into believing the child died when really he’s been handed over for adoption; the fantastical, hopefulness of an orphan for his birth parents; the bullying that happens in orphanages; the shady adult who tries to scare a kid into silence; the concerned social worker who sincerely cares for the child; the distraught birth mother who just found out her child is alive. There was enough realism in it to balance the “fairy tale elements.”
Adoptive Families has a webpage where they give a thumbs up/thumbs down to representations of adoption in media, and they gave a thumbs down to Meet the Robinsons for the way the protagonist is “rejected by over 100 prospective families.” I wonder how they’d rate August Rush (that is, if they ever update this page…)
I think it’s really interesting how feature films show children finding and reuniting with their birth parents, but children’s books barely broach the topic of birth parents, let alone birth parent searches, and let’s not even hope that they would show birth parent reunions.
Because that never happens in real life, right? It only happens in fairy tales.